ME/CFS Research
Russian studies on historical chronic fatigue syndrome, with reported results, study doses and original sources. Related research covers fatigue in other clinical populations, animal models and occupational settings.
Key reported findings
| Intervention | Study | Reported result |
|---|---|---|
| Cortexin electrophoresis | 100 · historical CFS | 88% with Cortexin electrophoresis, 60% with galvanization alone and 44% with sham, as summarized in 2013. |
| Intramuscular Cortexin | 78 · historical CFS | 43/56 (77%) rated good, 11/56 (20%) satisfactory and 2/56 (4%) unsatisfactory. The corresponding distribution for the 22 comparison patients was not supplied. |
| Phenotropil and piracetam | 70 · historical CFS subgroup | 28/32 (87.5%) with Phenotropil and 11/20 (55%) with piracetam. The authors reported p<0.05 for the drug comparison. |
| Phenibut (Noofen) | 53 · fatigue with chronic cerebral ischemia | MFI-20 fell from 67.3±4.7 to 41.4±3.1 in the Noofen arm (within-arm p<0.001). Authors reported no change in usual care. |
The historical studies used definitions of chronic fatigue syndrome that may differ from current ME/CFS criteria, including whether post-exertional malaise was required. The doses below describe the study protocols.
Compounds and preparations studied
Russian clinical comparisons in chronic fatigue syndrome
Comparison in people · 2010
Endonasal Cortexin for chronic fatigue syndrome: Melnikova dissertation and companion reports
The 2017 paper reports 100 adults aged 28–45 with historical CFS, mean age 31.5 ± 4.8 years. The arms were Cortexin electrophoresis (50), endonasal galvanization alone (25), and sham (25).
- Author-rated improvement in the 100-person comparison
- 88% with Cortexin electrophoresis, 60% with galvanization alone and 44% with sham, as summarized in 2013.
- Additional results in the dissertation excerpts
- Reduced asthenic and neurotic symptoms in 88% and pain in 90%, with improved neurological status in 92%. The excerpts do not identify the denominator for each measure.
- Duration of reported benefit
- The 2010 excerpt and 2017 paper describe benefit at one year in all observed treated patients. The 2010 excerpt reports 25% beyond one year. The 2020 abstract says most still benefited at one year. The publications reviewed give no follow-up denominator for this comparison.
Methods, study doses and limitations
Melnikova’s dissertation excerpts identify endonasal electrophoresis using a Potok-1 device and describe bench tests of Cortexin stability under direct current. The accessible CFS sources do not establish the Cortexin amount, solution concentration or session schedule. A later glaucoma paper citing her method used 10 sessions at 1–2 mA, with 10 minutes for the first three sessions and 15 minutes thereafter. Those settings are documented for glaucoma.
The available dissertation material consists of excerpts. Allocation, masking, adverse-event counts, follow-up denominators, and a required post-exertional malaise criterion could not be verified. The comparative percentages reflect the authors’ combined clinical and instrumental assessment. The 2017 paper coauthored by Melnikova cites her 2010 dissertation and reports the same 50/25/25 allocation as the 2020 abstract. Their EEG and cognitive results use nearly identical wording. The reports likely reuse the same cohort and contribute a single 100-person comparison to the evidence summary. Participant-level confirmation is unavailable.
Dissertation excerpts and related reports. The 2017 paper supplies arm sizes; the 2013 review supplies comparative percentages. · Candidate of Medical Sciences dissertation, Moscow, 126 pp., RSL 01004662270
Dissertation and publication trail
The Russian State Library’s table of contents places treatment methods on pp. 46–47. View the table of contents ↗
Dissertation excerpts ↗ · Shakula and Melnikova’s 2007 paper record ↗
2013 review and reported outcomes ↗ · 2017 paper and group sizes ↗ · 2020 proceedings ↗
Study record ↗ · Russian State Library dissertation record ↗
Comparison in people · 2010
Cortexin in a Russian chronic fatigue syndrome comparison
78 adults aged 19–46 with author-defined CFS, 56 adjunctive Cortexin and 22 comparison
- Clinical ratings in the Cortexin arm
- 43/56 (77%) rated good, 11/56 (20%) satisfactory and 2/56 (4%) unsatisfactory. The corresponding distribution for the 22 comparison patients was not supplied.
- Visual-motor performance
- The proportion rated substantially impaired fell from 33.7% to 19%, and moderately impaired from 36.5% to 12%, in a before-and-after comparison.
Methods, study doses and limitations
Both groups received a package of treatments. The Cortexin group also received 10 mg intramuscularly daily for 10 days, with repeat courses when needed. The authors used a symptom-list definition in which post-exertional discomfort lasting more than 24 hours was one optional criterion.
Allocation and masking are unclear. Clinical ratings in the Cortexin group do not estimate a controlled effect. The historical case definition did not require PEM.
Original Russian-language source · Russian Medical Journal, issue 16, p. 1004
Comparison in people · 2006
Phenotropil and piracetam in a Russian chronic fatigue comparison
180 participants across asthenic syndrome and CFS groups. The CFS subgroup totaled 70 (32 Phenotropil, 20 piracetam, 18 placebo).
- Complete or partial symptom response in the CFS subgroup
- 28/32 (87.5%) with Phenotropil and 11/20 (55%) with piracetam. The authors reported p<0.05 for the drug comparison.
- Placebo
- The authors report no complete response. The narrative gives no matching count for partial response.
Methods, study doses and limitations
Four-week oral comparison. Phenotropil started at 50 mg twice daily and was titrated to 200–250 mg/day. Piracetam was 400 mg three times daily. Placebo mimicked the Phenotropil regimen.
The dossier does not establish random allocation, assessor masking or a modern case definition requiring PEM. The authors’ criteria describe symptom relief over four weeks.
Original Russian-language source · MEDI.RU author report, March 2006
The 2017 paper coauthored by Melnikova cites her 2010 dissertation and reports the same 50/25/25 allocation as the 2020 abstract. Their EEG and cognitive results use nearly identical wording. The reports likely reuse the same cohort and contribute a single 100-person comparison to the evidence summary. Participant-level confirmation is unavailable. 2020 conference findings ↗