Research libraryMOLEKUL / SOURCE RECORD

Cheprasov’s Medilab peptide comparisons in aerospace stress

V. V. Cheprasov · 1997 · Kirov Military Medical Academy doctoral dissertation author abstract, Table 1 and methods

Indexed 2026-11-09.

Human comparative studyRussian source · see review scopeSource linked

Related evidence maps: Military & occupational ↗

Reported findings and study design

The three test series covered hypoxia, motion tolerance and 24 hours of work. The abstract reports favorable task results for selected peptides and gives a tiny separate postflight Thymogen comparison.

Hypobaric test: three arms of 10 at 5,000 m for 60 min. Motion: seven arms of 10 in a Coriolis test. Work: four arms of four at 50% of individually tolerated load. Postflight: four mission pairs, one participant per pair given Thymogen.

Dose, route and schedule

Hypoxia: intranasal Cortexin or Thymalin, 20 mg per course over two days, or placebo. Motion: single intranasal 5 mg Thymalin, Cortexin, Prostatilen or Epithalamin, or 50 µg Thymogen, with oral scopolamine 0.1 mg and placebo controls. Work: nasal Thymogen 100 µg or Cortexin 10 mg before work and after 6 and 12 h, or oral sydnocarb plus Bemitil, or saline. Postflight: intranasal Thymogen 100 µg/day for seven days.

Protocol source ↗ · Author’s abstract transcription. Full dissertation and underlying records unavailable.

Reported findings and study figures · Author’s abstract transcription. Full dissertation and underlying records unavailable.
MeasureResultComparison, timing and statistics
Hypobaric comparisonThymalin: 15–20% higher work measures; Cortexin: 10–15% improvement in selected operator measuresAbstract narrative; full arm-level estimates unavailable.
Coriolis motion toleranceCortexin +89%, Thymogen +73%, Epithalamin +68%Reported tolerance-time improvement relative to control, ten per arm.
Sustained workAuthor reported recovery of selected Thymogen-group measures to baseline by three hoursFour per arm. Cortexin and oral Bemitil plus sydnocarb were separate comparators.
Postflight respiratory infections1 of 4 in Thymogen arm versus 4 of 4 salineReported during the following year, a descriptive count from four pairs.
Program headcount328 stated; stage rows add to 338The 116 and 8 are subseries, with no additional headcount contributed to the historical tally.

The aerospace findings concern separate stress and recovery tasks, with no reliable pooled treatment effect.

Source for the extracted data ↗ · Checked 2026-11-09

Molekul summary of the linked publication. Educational information, not medical advice. Seek qualified healthcare help for medical conditions.

Methods, limitations & source review

Study limitations

  • Small comparisons, incomplete outcome reporting and unclear separation from related Medilab publications.
  • The 47 modeling experts were outside the participant table.

Publication counts are not counts of independent trials. Reviews, translations and reports sharing participants may overlap. Findings apply to the studied preparation, population and endpoints.

Document format: Author’s abstract transcription. Full dissertation and underlying records unavailable.

Review depth: Reported methods, results and evidence limitations

Related-report group: cheprasov-medilab-1997. Reports in this group are not assumed to be independent trials.

Source access and review scope

Author’s abstract transcription. Full dissertation and underlying records unavailable.

Recorded source-check date: 2026-11-09. This date does not imply a completed systematic review.

Source type: Kirov Military Medical Academy doctoral dissertation author abstract, Table 1 and methods

Open original source or index record ↗

Citation and original source

Original source: V. V. Cheprasov. Cheprasov’s Medilab peptide comparisons in aerospace stress Kirov Military Medical Academy doctoral dissertation author abstract, Table 1 and methods 1997.

Molekul research summary: https://molekul.io/research/cheprasov-peptide-performance-1997. Cite the original publication for its findings and this page when referring to Molekul’s summary or evidence appraisal.

Bibliography entry

Related compound profiles

Editorial policy and evidence standards