← Compound index
COMPOUND RECORD / DILEPT

Dilept

CognitionPerformance
Source linked
Research profile — evidence review incomplete. Topic tags are research navigation, not indications or recommendations. Source access does not establish effectiveness or safety.
01 / OVERVIEW

What is it?

An experimental neurotensin-related peptidomimetic also called GZR-123. Its environmental-stress source is linked below; clinical effectiveness is not established.

Identity / background source ↗

Research context

An experimental neurotensin-related peptidomimetic (GZR-123), included in the 2007 environmental-chamber comparison.

Working classification
Environmental nootropic research
Research collection
Related nootropics & combinations · editorial grouping
Institutional provenance
Not established for this compound record
Last evidence review
Full evidence review pending; source-check scope appears with each publication below.
02 / EVIDENCE DIMENSIONS

What do we know?

Human research
—Shared environmental comparison; not independent replication
Study methods
—Small groups, historical controls and unresolved allocation
Independent replication
—Possible overlap with the Academy report
Source access
—Original Russian journal PDF; selected methods checked
Safety evidence
—Human long-term safety and operational protection not established

These are independent review fields, not a rating. Missing evidence in this starter does not mean no research exists.

03 / SOURCE TRAIL

Linked sources

Explore the research map and unresolved leads ↗

2007Clinical trial / comparisonFull text available

Meteoadaptogenic properties of peptide drugs in healthy volunteers

Format: Original journal PDF · Reviewed: Methods and selected tables; encoding limits

P. D. Shabanov, V. P. Ganapolsky, P. V. Aleksandrov · Eksp Klin Farmakol. 70(6):41–47

Cold, heat and simulated altitude experiments compared four preparations, placebo and historical no-drug measurements. Effects varied by compound and endpoint.

Population / setting
127 healthy men aged 20–24 across a three-day environmental programme; active groups reported as 10–20, placebo 8–10 per stage
What was checked
Publisher PDF methods and selected tables checked. Cyrillic text encoding limits numerical transcription; full table-level verification remains incomplete.
Limitations & review scope
  • Random allocation and blinding not established; historical controls and baseline differences limit attribution.
  • Exact arm-by-environment denominators remain unresolved; 127 is the programme total, not Noopept enrollment.
  • Experimental intranasal peptide preparations are not equivalent to marketed oral products.
  • No validated protection from heat illness, operational accidents or long-term harm.
  • Possible overlap with the Academy report; do not count as independent replication.

Source checked 2026-10-02. This is a source-linked record, not a completed evidence review.

Read the source ↗
Browse bibliography & PDFs ↗