Research libraryMOLEKUL / SOURCE RECORD

Kim’s five-peptide stress comparison: Chapter 6.4 evidence audit

A. E. Kim · 2024 · Kirov Military Medical Academy doctoral dissertation, 359 pp.; 2024 bibliography, related catalog entry dated 2025

Animal / experimentalRussian source · see review scopeSource linked

Related evidence maps: Military & occupational ↗ · Missing author abstract

Reported findings and study design

The chapter identifies Cortexin, Pineamin, Prostatilen, Thymalin and Thymogen. The author highlights Pineamin in conclusions; original outcome tables and dose schedules have not been recovered.

Separate animal pharmacology experiments; participant-level and group-level counts for the five preparations unavailable

Protocol information

Peptide doses, routes, group assignments and timing require Chapter 6.4. The separate 25 mg/kg DMAE derivative was not Pineamin or another peptide.

Protocol source ↗ · Dissertation catalog, Chapter 6.4 heading, methods summary and conclusions; 49-page author abstract cataloged but not retrieved; original comparison tables unavailable

Reported findings and study figures · Dissertation catalog, Chapter 6.4 heading, methods summary and conclusions; 49-page author abstract cataloged but not retrieved; original comparison tables unavailable
MeasureResultComparison, timing and statistics
Comparative preparationsCortexin, Pineamin, Prostatilen, Thymalin and ThymogenChapter 6.4 title. Thymogen is a defined dipeptide; the five entries are not all tissue extracts.
Pineamin · animal stress modelsAuthor highlights resistance to hypoxia, heat and coldSelected conclusions only; dose, sample sizes, numerical results and ranking unavailable.
Five-agent effect estimatesOriginal comparative tables not recoveredNo verified head-to-head result for Pineamin versus Cortexin, Thymalin, Thymogen or Prostatilen.
HIF-1α and TSPOPredictive-marker hypothesis; peptide-specific causal data unavailableDo not attribute nonpeptide DMAE-derivative findings to the peptide groups.
Document acquisition49-page dissertation abstract with tables cataloged in 2024Find the original author abstract and Chapter 6.4 before updating any ranking.

This is a documented animal comparison with inaccessible efficacy tables. Existing Pineamin reproductive studies establish a separate clinical setting, not evidence for physical performance or environmental resilience.

Source for the extracted data ↗ · Checked 2026-11-08

Molekul summary of the linked publication. Educational information, not medical advice. Seek qualified healthcare help for medical conditions.

Methods, limitations & source review

Study limitations

  • The 1990s Biorhythmology and Rang-97 records were reanalyzed; they are not new human recruits. The 2022–2024 physiology studies were separate.
  • The conclusions do not provide numerical comparisons between the five preparations.
  • The accessible account associates HIF-1α and TSPO measurements with stress physiology and discusses the nonpeptide DMAE derivative separately; a Pineamin-mediated biomarker mechanism is not established.

Publication counts are not counts of independent trials. Reviews, translations and reports sharing participants may overlap. Findings apply to the studied preparation, population and endpoints.

Document format: Dissertation catalog, Chapter 6.4 heading, methods summary and conclusions; 49-page author abstract cataloged but not retrieved; original comparison tables unavailable

Review depth: Reported methods, results and evidence limitations

Source access and review scope

Dissertation catalog, Chapter 6.4 heading, methods summary and conclusions; 49-page author abstract cataloged but not retrieved; original comparison tables unavailable

Recorded source-check date: 2026-11-08. This date does not imply a completed systematic review.

Source type: Dissertation

Open original source or index record ↗

Citation and original source

Original source: A. E. Kim. Kim’s five-peptide stress comparison: Chapter 6.4 evidence audit Kirov Military Medical Academy doctoral dissertation, 359 pp.; 2024 bibliography, related catalog entry dated 2025 2024.

Molekul research summary: https://molekul.io/research/kim-five-peptides-2024. Cite the original publication for its findings and this page when referring to Molekul’s summary or evidence appraisal.

Bibliography entry

Related compound profiles

Editorial policy and evidence standards