Research libraryMOLEKUL / SOURCE RECORD

Thymogen and four peptide preparations in hypoxia, heat and cold

E. B. Shustov, M. T. Gasanov, G. D. Kapanadze, Yu. V. Fokin, V. S. Novikov, E. L. Matveenko, Kh. Kh. Semenov · 2018 · Biomeditsina 2018(2):4–14, Tables 1–3; paired with 2014 Volume III Table 11

Indexed 2026-11-09.

Animal / experimentalRussian source · see review scopeSource linked

Related evidence maps: Military & occupational ↗

Reported findings and study design

In the three-day rat comparison, Thymogen at 0.1 mg/kg gave 28.6±11.8 min versus 2.2±0.1 with saline. All 16 arms and their reported values match the 2014 monograph. Thymogen had no significant benefit on the air-cooling endpoint.

The single-dose mouse screen used 10,000 m, 8–10 per dose in the 2018 report (6–10 in the 2014 book). Table 1 instead reports a three-day rat series tested at 11,500 m the next day. Arm sizes for the repeated-dose table are not stated in the audited passage.

Dose, route and schedule

Historical animal protocol. Intraperitoneal dosing daily for three days for the course hypoxia series. Thymogen 0.001, 0.01 or 0.1 mg/kg, with distinct dose ranges for the other preparations.

Protocol source ↗ · Original 2018 methods and Tables 1–3 compared with Volume III Chapter 7, pp. 174–177.

Reported findings and study figures · Original 2018 methods and Tables 1–3 compared with Volume III Chapter 7, pp. 174–177.
MeasureResultComparison, timing and statistics
Thymogen · course hypoxia10.6±3.2, 20.1±11.1 and 28.6±11.8 minAt 0.001, 0.01 and 0.1 mg/kg respectively. Saline 2.2±0.1 min. · p<0.05, p<0.01 and p<0.01 versus saline as marked.
Thymalin · course hypoxia7.1±2.6 min at 0.1 mg/kg versus 2.2±0.1 min saline0.5 mg/kg arm was unmarked for significance. · p<0.05 for 0.1 mg/kg
Cortexin · course hypoxia and heat5.2±3.2 min at 1 mg/kg in hypoxia; 88.6±2.4 vs 96.5±5.2 min at 5 mg/kg in heatSeparate stress experiments and different doses. The heat endpoint shortened. · Both selected contrasts p<0.05 as marked
Prostatilen · course hypoxia7.0±5.6 min at 0.1 mg/kg versus 2.2±0.1 min salineAt 0.5 mg/kg: 4.2±0.7 min and a 66% increase in resistant animals as printed. · 0.1 mg/kg time p<0.01 as marked
Epithalamin · course hypoxia and cold7.4±4.5 min at 10 mg/kg in hypoxia; 194±22 vs 168±12 min at 0.5 mg/kg in air coolingSeparate dose and stress protocols. 1 mg/kg hypoxia arm was unmarked. · Both selected contrasts p<0.05 as marked
Thymogen · air cooling185±25 vs 168±12 min to rectal temperature of 35°C0.05 mg/kg versus control. No significant contrast marked.
Publication overlap2014 Table 11 and 2018 Table 1 repeat the same valuesCounts as one reported experiment. Both publications also describe a distinct acute mouse screen.
Matched course-hypoxia data · 2014 Table 11 and 2018 Table 1
Matched course-hypoxia data · 2014 Table 11 and 2018 Table 1
ArmDose (mg/kg unless noted)Time (min)Reported change (%)Resistant-animal share increase (%)
Saline1.0 as printed2.2±0.100
Thymalin0.17.1±2.6*23838
Thymalin0.53.7±1.07616
Thymalin1.04.4±2.2*11016
Cortexin0.13.9±1.4865
Cortexin0.53.8±0.4*8116
Cortexin1.05.2±3.2*1485
Prostatilen0.17.0±5.6**2330
Prostatilen0.54.2±0.7*10066*
Prostatilen1.02.4±1.01416
Epithalamin0.12.7±0.62215
Epithalamin1.01.8±0.500
Epithalamin10.07.4±4.5*23633
Thymogen0.00110.6±3.2*40548*
Thymogen0.0120.1±11.1**85760*
Thymogen0.128.6±11.8**126280**

M±m. * p<0.05, ** p<0.01 versus saline. Percentage column transcribed as printed and may differ from calculations using rounded means. The book’s adjacent mouse protocol describes the acute screen.

The papers distinguish the single-dose mouse screen from the three-day rat protocol. The matching table adds no independent animals or human participants.

Source for the extracted data ↗ · Checked 2026-11-09

Molekul summary of the linked publication. Educational information, not medical advice. Seek qualified healthcare help for medical conditions.

Methods, limitations & source review

Study limitations

  • The 2018 rat course results and 2014 book table belong to one evidence family. The book omits an explicit course-series species and altitude in the adjacent paragraph.
  • Short survival in an extreme animal model is separate from human endurance or safety.

Publication counts are not counts of independent trials. Reviews, translations and reports sharing participants may overlap. Findings apply to the studied preparation, population and endpoints.

Document format: Original 2018 methods and Tables 1–3 compared with Volume III Chapter 7, pp. 174–177.

Review depth: Reported methods, results and evidence limitations

Related-report group: shustov-2014-2018-course-hypoxia. Reports in this group are not assumed to be independent trials.

Source access and review scope

Original 2018 methods and Tables 1–3 compared with Volume III Chapter 7, pp. 174–177.

Recorded source-check date: 2026-11-09. This date does not imply a completed systematic review.

Source type: Biomeditsina 2018(2):4–14, Tables 1–3; paired with 2014 Volume III Table 11

Open original source or index record ↗

Citation and original source

Original source: E. B. Shustov, M. T. Gasanov, G. D. Kapanadze, Yu. V. Fokin, V. S. Novikov, E. L. Matveenko, Kh. Kh. Semenov. Thymogen and four peptide preparations in hypoxia, heat and cold Biomeditsina 2018(2):4–14, Tables 1–3; paired with 2014 Volume III Table 11 2018.

Molekul research summary: https://molekul.io/research/extreme-peptides-2018. Cite the original publication for its findings and this page when referring to Molekul’s summary or evidence appraisal.

Bibliography entry

Related compound profiles

Editorial policy and evidence standards