← Compound index
COMPOUND RECORD / POLYPRENOLS

PolyprenolsПолипренолы

CognitionRecoveryPerformance
Source linked
01 / OVERVIEW

About Polyprenols

Names in this research collection

Ropren · Ропрен · Picea abies polyprenols · Abies sibirica polyprenols

A collection covering distinct plant-polyprenol preparations. Ropren from European spruce appears in the Russian POLYNCOR clinical program and a mouse demyelination study; Siberian-fir polyprenols appear in Shustov’s preclinical work. Botanical source, composition and administration differ. Marine extracts in the related research map are separate preparations.

Research background

A collection covering distinct plant-polyprenol preparations. Ropren from European spruce appears in the Russian POLYNCOR clinical program and a mouse demyelination study; Siberian-fir polyprenols appear in Shustov’s preclinical work. Botanical source, composition and administration differ. Marine extracts in the related research map are separate preparations.

Shustov papers, coauthors and archival leads ↗

What the studies found

Animal research · 2026

Who or what was studiedRat study; group denominators not verified

Reported finding

Responses at approximately one month varied by model; an inositol derivative worsened selected neuromuscular findings in some animals.

Aminoethanol derivative and citicoline
Favorable responses depended on the experimental model.
Unfavorable response
An inositol derivative worsened selected neuromuscular findings in some animals.
All reported results & study design →
Methods, dose & source notes

Study of multiple preparations · Original preclinical journal publication

Animal findings do not establish human protection or clinical neuropathy benefit. The exact aminoethanol preparation is not sufficiently identified to equate it with ADK-17 or FDES. Group flow and agent-specific numerical outcomes require full text.

Potapov–Shustov: pharmacological correction of delayed neuropathy in rats ↗

Randomized study in people · 2018

Who or what was studiedAcute coronary syndrome; analyzed sample size absent from the checked abstract

Reported finding

Lower cholesterol and ALT were reported after two months; statin changes were less frequent.

Statin reduction/discontinuation for raised transaminases
Ropren: zero (0%); control: five (33.3%); reported p<0.05.
Cholesterol and ALT
Reported lower than control after two months, p<0.05; raw concentrations absent.
All reported results & study design →
Methods, dose & source notes

Study of this preparation · Clinical publication from NCT03122340

The reported 0 versus five (33.3%) statin changes do not establish the entire trial denominator. No mortality or cardiovascular-event benefit is established here. Industry affiliations appear among the authors; disclosures need full-text review. The 2021 report shares this program, not independent replication.

POLYNCOR: lipid and liver-enzyme findings with adjunctive Ropren ↗

Randomized study in people · 2021

Who or what was studied68 patients with acute coronary syndrome; 34 per group

Reported finding

Reported two-month improvements are within the Ropren arm, not an extracted placebo-adjusted benefit.

Reported sample
68 total; 34 per arm. Registry: 70 actual enrollees.
MoCA in Ropren arm
23 (21–25) at day 3; 26.5 (25–28) at two months; p<0.05.
At discharge
No between-group differences reported.
All reported results & study design →
Methods, dose & source notes

Study of this preparation · Conference abstract from the same POLYNCOR program

Participant flow must reconcile 70 registered versus 68 reported. No between-group differences were reported at discharge; later control values are absent. Not an independent trial or a general nootropic result.

POLYNCOR: anxiety, depression and cognition — conference report ↗

These highlights cover selected studies. Open a source for its methods, reported doses and full context.

Compound class
Natural-product research collection
Research collection
Related nootropics & combinations · editorial grouping
Research institutions
No institutional affiliation recorded
Source review
Review dates and the material assessed are listed with each publication below.
02 / HOW TO READ THE RESEARCH

Understanding the evidence

Human research

One identified POLYNCOR program with multiple reports; related preparations are not interchangeable

Study methods

Registered placebo-controlled adjunctive clinical research; animal toxicology and demyelination experiments

Independent replication

The 2018 and 2021 POLYNCOR reports belong to one trial program; external replication is unresolved

Source access

Registry JSON, indexed and publisher-deposited abstracts, and a complete original open-access XML article; see each record

Safety evidence

Limited preparation-specific observations; no class-wide safety or human MS-treatment conclusion

Open a topic for the evidence assessment.

More findings, background and history
EVIDENCE REVIEW / 6 OCTOBER 2026

Outstanding review questions

Check full allocation, comparator, prespecified outcomes, effect estimates, harms and shared-cohort reporting before drawing a clinical conclusion.

Human reports are linked; their presence does not establish effectiveness. Publication records can share participants. Source counts are not trial counts.

Browse original study records ↗
PATENT RESEARCH / COLLECTION UPDATED 7 NOVEMBER 2026

Patents and claimed inventions

These 1 grouped records distinguish claimed molecules, uses, formulations and related chemistry. Patent disclosure does not establish clinical benefit or approval.

1999 · RU2137479C1 · Polyprenols: immunomodulatory class-use patentUse · Stimulation occurred under some conditions and suppression under others

Narrative findings; numerical extraction incomplete

The direction of immune effects depended on genotype, exposure and assay; the patent does not support a uniformly stimulatory class effect.

Context-dependent immune response
Stimulation occurred under some conditions and suppression under othersNo single pooled clinical immune-effect size established
Stress-associated findings
Prevention of the reported humoral and macrophage-function impairment describedAnimal model; not a patient autoimmune outcome
All reported results, comparisons and limitations →

Use. The disclosure concerns polyprenols as an immunomodulatory class.

A chemical-class patent does not authenticate every Ropren or POLYNCOR product, nor demonstrate each product's clinical effect.

Publication
RU2137479C1 ↗ · 1999-09-20
Earliest priority / filing
1997-08-27 / 1997-08-27
Original applicant / assignee
Солагран Лимитед
Indexed status
Not shown; official status unverified · checked 2026-11-06
Patent family
20196666 · family publications are related filings, not independent studies.
Original title, inventors and related publications

Immunomodulating agent

Inventors: В.И. Рощин.

RU2137479C1

Original patent PDF ↗

Read source review →

Status is an indexed snapshot, not an official legal assessment. Search the patent collection and read the method →

03 / SOURCE RECORDS

Linked sources

Explore the research map and unresolved leads ↗

1999 · Polyprenols: immunomodulatory class-use patent — RU2137479C1Context-dependent immune response: Stimulation occurred under some conditions and suppression under others
1999Patent / reported experimentsFull text available

Polyprenols: immunomodulatory class-use patent — RU2137479C1

Patent-defined substance or composition · Patent publication

Format: Original patent text and indexed metadata · Reviewed: Claims, selected reported findings and limitations reviewed; supporting experiments not comprehensively appraised.

В.И. Рощин · RU2137479C1 · patent family 20196666

The direction of immune effects depended on genotype, exposure and assay; the patent does not support a uniformly stimulatory class effect.

Findings, study figures and available tables

Reported patent results

Narrative findings; numerical extraction incomplete

The direction of immune effects depended on genotype, exposure and assay; the patent does not support a uniformly stimulatory class effect.

Conifer-derived polyprenol immune-response experiments in animals, including stress-associated immune suppression.

Reported findings and study figures · Final immune-response and stress-model conclusions.
MeasureResultComparison, timing and statistics
Context-dependent immune responseStimulation occurred under some conditions and suppression under othersNo single pooled clinical immune-effect size established
Stress-associated findingsPrevention of the reported humoral and macrophage-function impairment describedAnimal model; not a patient autoimmune outcome

These class-level animal findings cannot authenticate or establish efficacy of every Ropren/POLYNCOR formulation, and immune stimulation is not automatically beneficial in autoimmune disease.

Source for the extracted data ↗ · Checked 2026-11-06

Population / setting
Conifer-derived polyprenol immune-response experiments in animals, including stress-associated immune suppression.
What was checked
Original patent publication accessed through Google Patents. Claims, selected reported findings and source limitations checked. The results section identifies the examples, tables and any numerical extraction gaps. No complete experimental audit, prosecution review or legal claim construction was performed.
Limitations & review scope
  • A chemical-class patent does not authenticate every Ropren or POLYNCOR product, nor demonstrate each product's clinical effect.
  • These class-level animal findings cannot authenticate or establish efficacy of every Ropren/POLYNCOR formulation, and immune stimulation is not automatically beneficial in autoimmune disease.
  • Patents record claimed inventions and supporting disclosures. Publication or grant does not establish clinical efficacy, safety or marketing approval. Members of one patent family and related journal reports can describe the same experiments.
  • Status labels are Google Patents index snapshots for the displayed publication or application; the record gives its source-check date. Official registers and every national family member have not been independently checked. These labels do not establish freedom to operate.

Source checked 2026-11-06. See the review scope above for the material assessed.

Read the source ↗
2026 · Potapov–Shustov: pharmacological correction of delayed neuropathy in ratsAminoethanol derivative and citicoline: Favorable responses depended on the experimental model.
2026Animal / experimentalRussian source · see review scope

Potapov–Shustov: pharmacological correction of delayed neuropathy in rats

Aminoethanol and inositol derivatives, polyprenols, citicoline and Cortexin comparators · Original preclinical journal publication

Format: Original publisher abstract and references · Reviewed: Abstract, authors and citation trail checked; full tables not recovered

P. K. Potapov, E. B. Shustov, V. Ya. Apchel, A. N. Smirnov, A. S. Melekhova, M. V. Melnikova, V. A. Basharin, A. A. Bondarenko · Bulletin of the Russian Military Medical Academy. 2026;28(1):33–44

Responses at approximately one month varied by model; an inositol derivative worsened selected neuromuscular findings in some animals.

Findings, study figures and available tables

Reported findings and study design

Rat experiment with day-30 neuromuscular measurements; compound identities and group denominators need full-paper confirmation.

Reported findings and study figures · Original publisher abstract; qualitative findings only
MeasureResultComparison, timing and statistics
Aminoethanol derivative and citicolineFavorable responses depended on the experimental model.
Unfavorable responseAn inositol derivative worsened selected neuromuscular findings in some animals.

Not every tested agent showed benefit. No human efficacy estimate or equivalence with ADK-17/FDES established.

Source for the extracted data ↗ · Checked 2026-11-06

Population / setting
Rat study; group denominators not verified
What was checked
Original abstract; no quantitative treatment effect extracted.
Limitations & review scope
  • Animal findings do not establish human protection or clinical neuropathy benefit.
  • The exact aminoethanol preparation is not sufficiently identified to equate it with ADK-17 or FDES.
  • Group flow and agent-specific numerical outcomes require full text.

Source checked 2026-11-06. See the review scope above for the material assessed.

Read the source ↗
2018 · POLYNCOR: lipid and liver-enzyme findings with adjunctive RoprenStatin reduction/discontinuation for raised transaminases: Ropren: zero (0%); control: five (33.3%); reported p<0.05.
2018Randomized trialEnglish abstract

POLYNCOR: lipid and liver-enzyme findings with adjunctive Ropren

Ropren plus standard care versus placebo plus standard care · Clinical publication from NCT03122340

Format: PubMed/Europe PMC abstract and original registry JSON · Reviewed: Abstract and registry checked; full paper not recovered

E. V. Vyshlov, E. I. Tsoy, V. S. Sultanov, V. B. Trusov, V. V. Ryabov · Bulletin of Experimental Biology and Medicine. 165(3):319–321

Lower cholesterol and ALT were reported after two months; statin changes were less frequent.

Findings, study figures and available tables

Reported findings and study design

Reported findings and study figures · Original indexed abstract; registry identity cross-checked
MeasureResultComparison, timing and statistics
Statin reduction/discontinuation for raised transaminasesRopren: zero (0%); control: five (33.3%); reported p<0.05.
Cholesterol and ALTReported lower than control after two months, p<0.05; raw concentrations absent.

The subgroup denominator and full safety accounting need the paper. This does not establish fewer cardiovascular events.

Source for the extracted data ↗ · Checked 2026-11-06

Population / setting
Acute coronary syndrome; analyzed sample size absent from the checked abstract
What was checked
Original indexed abstract; registry links this publication to POLYNCOR.
Limitations & review scope
  • The reported 0 versus five (33.3%) statin changes do not establish the entire trial denominator.
  • No mortality or cardiovascular-event benefit is established here.
  • Industry affiliations appear among the authors; disclosures need full-text review.
  • The 2021 report shares this program, not independent replication.

Source checked 2026-11-06. See the review scope above for the material assessed.

Read the source ↗
2021 · POLYNCOR: anxiety, depression and cognition — conference reportReported sample: 68 total; 34 per arm. Registry: 70 actual enrollees.
2021Randomized trialEnglish abstract

POLYNCOR: anxiety, depression and cognition — conference report

Adjunctive Ropren versus placebo · Conference abstract from the same POLYNCOR program

Format: Publisher abstract and deposited Crossref text · Reviewed: Complete abstract checked

E. I. Tsoi, E. V. Vyshlov, V. V. Ryabov · European Heart Journal: Acute Cardiovascular Care. 10(Supplement 1):zuab020.107

Reported two-month improvements are within the Ropren arm, not an extracted placebo-adjusted benefit.

Findings, study figures and available tables

Reported findings and study design

Reported findings and study figures · Complete publisher conference abstract; within-arm medians
MeasureResultComparison, timing and statistics
Reported sample68 total; 34 per arm. Registry: 70 actual enrollees.
MoCA in Ropren arm23 (21–25) at day 3; 26.5 (25–28) at two months; p<0.05.
At dischargeNo between-group differences reported.

Later control scores are absent; the improvement is not a placebo-adjusted effect.

Source for the extracted data ↗ · Checked 2026-11-06

Population / setting
68 patients with acute coronary syndrome; 34 per group
What was checked
Original abstract; registry separately reports actual enrollment of 70.
Limitations & review scope
  • Participant flow must reconcile 70 registered versus 68 reported.
  • No between-group differences were reported at discharge; later control values are absent.
  • Not an independent trial or a general nootropic result.

Source checked 2026-11-06. See the review scope above for the material assessed.

Read the source ↗
2019 · Spruce polyprenols in a mouse demyelination modelAnimals and histology: 27 allocated, nine per group; histology examined seven per group.
2019Animal / experimentalFull text available

Spruce polyprenols in a mouse demyelination model

Picea abies polyprenols supplied as Ropren; injected experimental preparation · Original preclinical research; Shustov is not an author

Format: Complete original open-access XML recovered through Europe PMC · Reviewed: Methods, results narrative and stated limitations checked; graph values not visually transcribed

M. Y. Khodanovich, A. O. Pishchelko, V. Y. Glazacheva, E. S. Pan, E. P. Krutenkova, V. B. Trusov, V. L. Yarnykh · Phytotherapy Research. 33(5):1363–1373

The authors reported greater myelin-marker signal and altered cell-marker patterns in treated mice compared with toxin-exposed vehicle controls.

Findings, study figures and available tables

Reported findings and study design

Reported findings and study figures · Original full-text XML, methods and results narrative; no graph-digitized effect sizes
MeasureResultComparison, timing and statistics
Animals and histology27 allocated, nine per group; histology examined seven per group.
Myelin and cell markersThe treated group had greater myelin-basic-protein signal than the toxin-exposed vehicle group; selected precursor-cell and immature-neuron markers also differed.

The design does not isolate remyelination from protection against continued injury, and it is not a human MS treatment study.

Source for the extracted data ↗ · Checked 2026-11-06

Population / setting
27 male CD-1 mice; three groups of nine; brain histology used seven animals per group
What was checked
Original methods and results; random group allocation, blinded histology/image analysis and multiplicity-adjusted comparisons described.
Limitations & review scope
  • A toxin-induced demyelination model does not establish control of autoimmune disease or clinical benefit in multiple sclerosis.
  • The authors could not distinguish protection against continuing damage from enhanced repair; remyelination was not isolated as the mechanism.
  • One endpoint time and no polyprenol-only healthy control limit interpretation.
  • Twenty-seven animals were allocated, while histology used seven per group. The selected methods passage does not explain this subset.
  • Experimental injection is not equivalent to oral Ropren exposure in humans; nonsignificance against healthy controls is not proof of equivalence.

Source checked 2026-11-06. See the review scope above for the material assessed.

Read the source ↗
2020 · Shustov’s polyprenol neuroprotection leadOxidative injury and antioxidant enzymes: Reduced oxidative stress and increased glutathione-S-transferase activity were reported.
2020Animal / experimentalEnglish abstract

Shustov’s polyprenol neuroprotection lead

Polyprenol preparation; complete identity specification pending · Preclinical report with neuropharmacology discussion

Format: Publisher-deposited Crossref abstract · Reviewed: Abstract checked; original PDF unavailable

E. B. Shustov, V. A. Kashuro, E. G. Batotsyrenova, E. A. Zolotoverkhaya, A. E. Kim, T. A. Kostrova · Journal Biomed. 16(3):125–129

The authors report reduced oxidative stress and increased glutathione-S-transferase activity in an experimental injury setting.

Findings, study figures and available tables

Reported findings and study design

Reported findings and study figures · Publisher-deposited or original indexed abstract; qualitative extraction
MeasureResultComparison, timing and statistics
Oxidative injury and antioxidant enzymesReduced oxidative stress and increased glutathione-S-transferase activity were reported.

Resolve preparation identity and retrieve the original groups and measurements.

Source for the extracted data ↗ · Checked 2026-11-06

Population / setting
Laboratory animals in a chronic toxic-exposure model; sample size absent from the checked abstract
What was checked
Publisher-deposited abstract; no human result.
Limitations & review scope
  • Raw outcomes, group sizes and allocation are not supplied in the reviewed abstract.
  • The English abstract uses polyphenols in one sentence despite the title and context saying polyprenols; check the original preparation.
  • Biochemical changes do not establish human cognitive or autoimmune benefit.

Source checked 2026-11-06. See the review scope above for the material assessed.

Read the source ↗
2024 · Siberian-fir polyprenols under combined adverse exposuresReported preclinical responses: Antioxidant, anabolic and hematopoietic activity was described.
2024Animal / experimentalEnglish abstract

Siberian-fir polyprenols under combined adverse exposures

Polyprenols from Abies sibirica needles · Original preclinical report; same source as the existing shustov-polyprenols-2024 bibliography lead

Format: Publisher-deposited Crossref abstract and indexed original first-page metadata · Reviewed: Abstract and metadata checked; complete PDF not recovered

M. V. Melnikova, E. B. Shustov, E. A. Zolotoverkhaya, L. G. Kubarskaya, A. A. Bondarenko, A. V. Belskaya, A. A. Vataeva · Journal Biomed. 20(3):89–93

Antioxidant, anabolic and hematopoietic activity is reported in an experimental combined-exposure setting.

Findings, study figures and available tables

Reported findings and study design

Reported findings and study figures · Publisher-deposited or original indexed abstract; qualitative extraction
MeasureResultComparison, timing and statistics
Reported preclinical responsesAntioxidant, anabolic and hematopoietic activity was described.

Qualitative report of the same 2024 publication already present as an archival lead; not an independent replication or human result.

Source for the extracted data ↗ · Checked 2026-11-06

Population / setting
Preclinical combined-exposure model; denominators absent from the reviewed abstract
What was checked
Qualitative abstract-level extraction; not a newly recovered complete paper.
Limitations & review scope
  • Siberian-fir preparation is not assumed identical to European-spruce Ropren.
  • Raw tables, sample sizes and exposure-specific comparisons remain unavailable.
  • An indexed first-page date differs from deposited publication metadata; both identify 2024.
  • No clinical environmental-protection benefit follows from the animal report.

Source checked 2026-11-06. See the review scope above for the material assessed.

Read the source ↗

Follow shared publications or research classes. These links do not establish equivalent effects between compounds.

Research collection curated by @PepMariner · editorial standards. Send a source correction ↗

Browse bibliography & PDFs ↗