← Compound index
COMPOUND RECORD / NEPHROPEPT

NephropeptНефропепт

Source linked
Research profile Explore published studies, research topics and source-specific findings below.
01 / OVERVIEW

What is it?

Nephropept is a kidney-derived polypeptide mixture in the organ-extract research tradition. It is not a single defined peptide. The linked Phase II listing describes a clinical development plan; it does not provide trial outcomes.

Identity / background source ↗

Organ-derived peptide research: clinical findings and lineage ↗

Research context

A kidney-derived polypeptide complex explicitly studied in rat tissue cultures and listed in a Phase II development program for chronic kidney disease with type 2 diabetes. It is distinct from oral Pielotax and from synthetic EDL.

Selected study findings

in vitro · 2023

Study of multiple preparations · Indexed abstract; full methods not assessed

Rat spleen, liver, kidney and brain-cortex explant cultures

The report explicitly identifies Nephropept as the kidney complex alongside Thymalin, Ventvil and Cortexin. Corresponding tissue explant growth increased by approximately 20–27%; combining preparations with Thymalin did not add a potentiating effect.

Limit: Explant-area growth is a laboratory endpoint, not evidence of organ regeneration in patients. Combined-extract findings do not support a clinical combination regimen or prove shared composition.

Combined effect of polypeptide complexes on organotypic rat tissue cultures ↗

Selected findings, not a systematic review or a treatment recommendation. Combination and related-preparation results cannot be attributed to this compound alone. See each source for access status and remaining limitations.

Compound class
Tissue-derived polypeptide preparation
Research collection
Peptide bioregulation · editorial grouping
Research institutions
No institutional affiliation recorded
Source review
Review dates and the material assessed are listed with each publication below.
02 / EVIDENCE DIMENSIONS

Evidence assessment

Human research
—Phase II protocol listed; numerical clinical results not recovered
Study methods
—Original findings separated from registry records and related-product research
Independent replication
—Independent confirmation not established by these linked records
Source access
—Source-specific review scopes accompany each record
Safety evidence
—Preparation-specific safety data are required; related products cannot substitute

These fields describe different aspects of the evidence. A missing record does not mean that no research exists.

Research context, history and detailed findings
EVIDENCE REVIEW / 6 OCTOBER 2026

Outstanding review questions

Appraise original methods and replication; keep animal and cell findings separate from unestablished human benefit and safety.

No human intervention report has been identified among the linked records; unclassified archival leads may remain. Publication records can share participants. Source counts are not trial counts.

View the collection-wide research audit ↗
PEPTIDE RESEARCH / OCT 2026

Related preparations and evidence

Evidence belongs to the preparation actually studied. A tissue extract and a synthetic peptide can belong to the same research tradition without having equivalent effects or safety.

Kidney: the molecular link

Nephropept / separately formulated Pielotax → AED, EDL and AEDG are related experimental sequences

A common tissue target does not establish identical extracts or prove that these sequences were isolated from Nephropept.

Clinical evidence and limitations

Pielotax has a historical institute report. The Nephropept Phase II registry reproduction lists a planned 210-person CKD study without numerical outcomes.

Recover the original protocol, actual enrollment, clinical-study report and preparation characterization.

Related preparations

Some references concern related extracts, reviews or molecular identification rather than direct studies of this compound.

Explore the full bioregulator collection ↗

View this preparation in the Khavinson evidence map ↗

03 / SOURCE RECORDS

Linked sources

Explore the research map and unresolved leads ↗

2023 · Combined effect of polypeptide complexes on organotypic rat tissue cultures
2023In vitroEnglish abstract

Combined effect of polypeptide complexes on organotypic rat tissue cultures

N. I. Chalisova, G. A. Ryzhak, E. S. Egorova · Molecular Medicine. 2023;(1).

The report explicitly identifies Nephropept as the kidney complex alongside Thymalin, Ventvil and Cortexin. Corresponding tissue explant growth increased by approximately 20–27%; combining preparations with Thymalin did not add a potentiating effect.

Population / setting
Rat spleen, liver, kidney and brain-cortex explant cultures
What was checked
Publisher English abstract and linked Russian PDF abstract checked.
Limitations & review scope
  • Explant-area growth is a laboratory endpoint, not evidence of organ regeneration in patients.
  • Combined-extract findings do not support a clinical combination regimen or prove shared composition.

Source checked 2026-10-07. See the review scope above for the material assessed.

Read the source ↗
2023 · Nephropept NPR-11-2022: Phase II trial registration
2023Not classifiedBibliographic record

Nephropept NPR-11-2022: Phase II trial registration

· Trial registration — results not reported

PeptidPRO (sponsor listed in registry reproduction) · Protocol NPR-11-2022; authorization 340 dated 30 June 2023.

The public registry reproduction describes a multicenter double-blind randomized placebo-controlled Phase II protocol. It lists dates of June 2023 to December 2024 and a target of 210 participants. This record contains no numerical efficacy or safety results.

Population / setting
Planned registry population: 210 patients with stage 3a–3b CKD and type 2 diabetes
What was checked
ClinLine registry reproduction checked; original regulatory record and results not recovered.
Limitations & review scope
  • Secondary registry reproduction, not the full protocol or a clinical-study report. Dates do not verify completion or actual enrollment.
  • Formulation and objective fields differ on strength; dose arms are not inferred. No treatment benefit is asserted.

Source checked 2026-10-07. See the review scope above for the material assessed.

Read the source ↗
Browse bibliography & PDFs ↗