Picamilon in stage I and II chronic cerebral ischemia: open comparative study
A. B. Danilov, N. N. Shindryaeva, I. V. Borodulina, T. D. Lunev · 2025 · Consilium Medicum. 2025;27(2)
What does this source report?
Open study reported cognitive and questionnaire changes during active treatment. Six participants did not complete; efficacy used the per-protocol population.
- Population and setting
- 100 enrolled; 94 in per-protocol efficacy analysis; stage I and II groups initially 50 each
- Evidence type
- Uncontrolled human report
- Preparation
- See the original report; formulation details require verification.
- Source language
- See linked publication
- Title provenance
- Title as recorded in the linked source or index. A separate original-language title has not been transcribed unless shown above.
What are the limitations?
- No untreated or placebo group.
- Shared investigators, protocols and cohort characteristics suggest possible overlap with the 2024 reports; this is an inference, not confirmed participant identity.
- Do not add 44, 50 and 100 as independent participants.
Publication counts are not counts of independent trials. Reviews, translations and reports sharing participants may overlap. Findings apply to the studied preparation, population and endpoints.
Document format: Publisher HTML article
Review depth: Methods and results
Related-report group: picamilon-2024-2025-overlap-unresolved. Reports in this group are not assumed to be independent trials.
Source access and review scope
Publisher methods and results checked; participant-level reconciliation with 2024 reports remains unresolved.
Recorded source-check date: 2026-10-02. This date does not imply a completed systematic review.
Cite and trace this record
Original source: A. B. Danilov, N. N. Shindryaeva, I. V. Borodulina, T. D. Lunev. Picamilon in stage I and II chronic cerebral ischemia: open comparative study Consilium Medicum. 2025;27(2) 2025.
Molekul research summary: https://molekul.io/research/picamilon-2025-cohort. Cite the original publication for its findings and this page when referring to Molekul’s summary or evidence appraisal.
Bibliography entry