Research libraryMOLEKUL / SOURCE RECORD

Pharmacological correction of immuno-metabolic disorders with the peptide Gly-His-Lys in hepatic damage induced by tetrachloromethane

M. Yu. Smakhtin, A. I. Konoplya, L. A. Sever’yanova, I. A. Shveinov · 2003 · Patologicheskaia Fiziologiia i Eksperimentalnaia Terapiia. 2003;(2):19–21. PMID 12838768

Animal / experimentalEnglish abstractSource linked

Reported findings and study design

Narrative findings; numerical extraction incomplete

A proliferation signal coexisted with adverse findings at the higher exposure.

Ten-day intraperitoneal GHK administration in experimental toxic liver injury; group sizes unavailable.

Dose, route and schedule

Ten-day intraperitoneal administration. Abstract prints 2.5/150 “mu/kg” in its dose statement and 1.5 “mu/kg” in its results; exact lower dose and unit require the original paper.

Protocol source ↗ · Original indexed abstract with internally conflicting dose text

Reported findings and study figures · Original indexed abstract with internally inconsistent dose statement
MeasureResultComparison, timing and statistics
Hepatocyte mitotic indexIncreased; no numerical treatment-versus-control estimate provided
Lower-exposure responseImproved liver functional activity and immune responsiveness describedResult sentence prints 1.5 “mu/kg”; opening dose sentence prints 2.5 “mu/kg”
Higher-exposure responseMore potent immunosuppression, worse serum biochemical indices and more dystrophic liver changes150 “mu/kg” as printed; malformed unit retained
Dose and access limitationLower-dose conflict and malformed “mu/kg” remain unresolved; original full paper needed

Increased cell division did not ensure improved liver condition. Do not silently substitute the dissertation’s µg/kg doses for the conflicting article abstract.

Source for the extracted data ↗ · Checked 2026-11-08

Molekul summary of the linked publication. Educational information, not medical advice. Seek qualified healthcare help for medical conditions.

Methods, limitations & source review

Study limitations

  • Animal endpoints do not establish human efficacy, a safe human dose or long-term safety. These were not GHK-Cu administration experiments.
  • The 2002 paper, 2003 paper, 2004 dissertation and related patent belong to the same research program; independence of their animal cohorts is unresolved.
  • The lower dose is printed as both 2.5 and 1.5, with the malformed unit “mu/kg”. The dissertation provides a separate µg/kg account, not a correction authenticated for this article.
  • No numerical enzyme changes, histology scores, group denominators or effect uncertainty supplied by the checked abstract.

Publication counts are not counts of independent trials. Reviews, translations and reports sharing participants may overlap. Findings apply to the studied preparation, population and endpoints.

Document format: Original indexed abstract

Review depth: Abstract checked; complete article and outcome tables unavailable

Related-report group: kursk-ghk-liver-2002-2004. Reports in this group are not assumed to be independent trials.

Source access and review scope

Original PubMed abstract checked. It prints 2.5 and 150 “mu/kg” initially but 1.5 “mu/kg” in the result sentence. The malformed unit and lower-dose conflict remain unresolved.

Recorded source-check date: 2026-11-08. This date does not imply a completed systematic review.

Source type: Original experimental journal publication

Open original source or index record ↗

Citation and original source

Original source: M. Yu. Smakhtin, A. I. Konoplya, L. A. Sever’yanova, I. A. Shveinov. Pharmacological correction of immuno-metabolic disorders with the peptide Gly-His-Lys in hepatic damage induced by tetrachloromethane Patologicheskaia Fiziologiia i Eksperimentalnaia Terapiia. 2003;(2):19–21. PMID 12838768 2003.

Molekul research summary: https://molekul.io/research/ghk-liver-injury-2003. Cite the original publication for its findings and this page when referring to Molekul’s summary or evidence appraisal.

Bibliography entry

Related compound profiles

Editorial policy and evidence standards