Research libraryMOLEKUL / SOURCE RECORD

Cortexin plus citicoline after spinal-cord injury: the 90-day Phoenix comparison

D. Y. Butko, S. S. Zabirov, S. N. Valchuk, S. N. Polkovnikova, T. Y. Lazareva, M. V. Kalinina, L. A. Danilenko, V. I. Kuznetsova, V. A. Vavilova · 2026 · Zh Nevrol Psikhiatr Im S S Korsakova. 2026;126(10):63–70. PMID 42973255

Indexed 2026-11-04.

Human comparative studyEnglish abstractSource linked

Reported findings and study design

Reported findings

At day 90, the combination groups had larger reported improvements in cognition, depression and fatigue than standard care. In the ASIA A stratum, at least 50% depression-score reduction occurred in 90% versus 20%.

60 adults aged 18–55 after gunshot-related spinal-cord injury; four groups defined by ASIA A/C severity and treatment; open prospective longitudinal comparison against standard care; assessment to day 90.

Dose, route and schedule

Cortexin 10 mg intramuscularly daily for 10 days plus oral citicoline 1000 mg/day for 30 days, alongside rehabilitation. Historical study regimen, not administration advice.

Protocol source ↗ · Indexed original abstract

Reported findings and study figures · Original indexed abstract; full text not appraised
MeasureResultComparison, timing and statistics
Depression response, ASIA A90% versus 20% achieved at least 50% HDRS-17 reductionCortexin plus citicoline and rehabilitation versus standard care; subgroup denominators not supplied · Day 90 · No between-group p-value or confidence interval supplied in the abstract
Cognitive change, ASIA AMoCA +2 [1.75; 3.25] versus +1.5 [1; 2] pointsCombination versus standard care; median changes with source-reported bracketed intervals · Day 90
Depression change, ASIA AHDRS-17 −10 [−12.25; −9] versus −5 [−5.75; −2] pointsCombination versus standard care · Day 90
Fatigue change, ASIA AAsthenic State Scale −33 [−34.25; −31.75] versus −26 [−26; −25] pointsCombination versus standard care · Day 90
Cognitive change, ASIA CMoCA +2 [2; 3] versus +1.5 [1; 2] pointsCombination versus standard care · Day 90
Depression change, ASIA CHDRS-17 −12.5 [−14; −9] versus −8 [−8.75; −6.25] pointsCombination versus standard care · Day 90
Fatigue change, ASIA CAsthenic State Scale −31 [−32; −30] versus −22 [−23.75; −22] pointsCombination versus standard care · Day 90
Serious adverse eventsNone reportedOther adverse-event counts and subgroup denominators absent from abstract; not evidence of long-term safety
Assessment scheduleDays 1, 15±2, 30±2 and 90±7

Results concern the combined treatment program. Open assignment, concurrent rehabilitation and missing subgroup uncertainty prevent a reliable Cortexin-specific effect estimate. No claim of spinal-cord regeneration is supported.

Source for the extracted data ↗ · Checked 2026-11-06

Molekul summary of the linked publication. Educational information, not medical advice. Seek qualified healthcare help for medical conditions.

Methods, limitations & source review

Study limitations

  • Prospective open comparison; randomization and allocation concealment are not established by the abstract.
  • Citicoline and rehabilitation were co-interventions; effects cannot be attributed to Cortexin alone.
  • Subgroup denominators, confidence intervals and between-group p-values are not supplied in the checked abstract.
  • Mood and cognitive outcomes do not demonstrate spinal-cord repair, restored walking or reduced disability.

Publication counts are not counts of independent trials. Reviews, translations and reports sharing participants may overlap. Findings apply to the studied preparation, population and endpoints.

Document format: Indexed original publication abstract

Review depth: Original indexed abstract and citation checked; full methods and tables not appraised

Related-report group: phoenix-sci-2026. Reports in this group are not assumed to be independent trials.

Source access and review scope

Original abstract retrieved through Europe PMC / PubMed. Publication year retained; index date is not the publication date.

Recorded source-check date: 2026-11-06. This date does not imply a completed systematic review.

Source type: Original clinical journal publication

Open original source or index record ↗

DOI: 10.17116/jnevro202612610163

Citation and original source

Original source: D. Y. Butko, S. S. Zabirov, S. N. Valchuk, S. N. Polkovnikova, T. Y. Lazareva, M. V. Kalinina, L. A. Danilenko, V. I. Kuznetsova, V. A. Vavilova. Cortexin plus citicoline after spinal-cord injury: the 90-day Phoenix comparison Zh Nevrol Psikhiatr Im S S Korsakova. 2026;126(10):63–70. PMID 42973255 2026.

Molekul research summary: https://molekul.io/research/cortexin-phoenix-2026. Cite the original publication for its findings and this page when referring to Molekul’s summary or evidence appraisal.

Bibliography entry

Related compound profiles

Editorial policy and evidence standards