Developmental dysphasia in children: a comparison of the effectiveness of two modes of peptidergic nootropic therapy
Zavadenko NN, Davydova LA, Suvorinova NY · 2020 · Zh Nevrol Psikhiatr Im S S Korsakova 120(10):38-44. PMID 33244956
What does this source report?
Compares one course, two courses and no medication over two months; reports vocabulary and phrase-use changes.
- Population and setting
- 94 children with developmental dysphasia
- Evidence type
- Human comparative study
- Preparation
- See the original report; formulation details require verification.
- Source language
- Russian
- Title provenance
- Title as recorded in the linked source or index. A separate original-language title has not been transcribed unless shown above.
What are the limitations?
- Allocation and masking unclear; overlap with earlier reports needs checking.
- Pediatric clinical findings do not establish enhancement or safety in healthy adults.
Publication counts are not counts of independent trials. Reviews, translations and reports sharing participants may overlap. Findings apply to the studied preparation, population and endpoints.
Source access and review scope
Indexed abstract and citation checked via Europe PMC / PubMed; full methods and risk of bias not appraised.
Recorded source-check date: 2026-09-29. This date does not imply a completed systematic review.
Cite and trace this record
Original source: Zavadenko NN, Davydova LA, Suvorinova NY. Developmental dysphasia in children: a comparison of the effectiveness of two modes of peptidergic nootropic therapy Zh Nevrol Psikhiatr Im S S Korsakova 120(10):38-44. PMID 33244956 2020.
Molekul research summary: https://molekul.io/research/bio-33244956. Cite the original publication for its findings and this page when referring to Molekul’s summary or evidence appraisal.
Bibliography entry