Research libraryMOLEKUL / SOURCE RECORD

CoQ10 plus NADH: larger double-blind ME/CFS study

Castro-Marrero J et al. · 2021 · Nutrients

Indexed 2026-11-12.

Randomized trialFull text availableSource linked

Reported findings and study design

Reported findings

CoQ10 200 mg plus NADH 20 mg daily for eight weeks, then four weeks of follow-up. The primary endpoint was fatigue impact.

Dose, route and schedule

CoQ10 200 mg plus NADH 20 mg daily for eight weeks, then four weeks of follow-up. The primary endpoint was fatigue impact.

Protocol source ↗ · Original source

Results · Original full text
MeasureResultComparison, timing and statistics
Total fatigue impactWithin the supplement group, total FIS-40 improved at week four (p=0.022). The paper reports parallel fatigue trajectories between groups.
Later assessmentsWithin-group total fatigue changes at eight weeks and four weeks after treatment were inconclusive (p=0.089 and p=0.071).

The highlighted four-week improvement was within the active group. Attrition and the absence of a convincing between-group fatigue difference constrain the result.

Source for these results ↗ · Reviewed 2026-11-12

For research and education. Consult a qualified clinician for medical advice.

Study limitations and source details

Study limitations

  • The highlighted four-week improvement was within the active group. Attrition and the absence of a convincing between-group fatigue difference constrain the result.

Source access

CoQ10 200 mg plus NADH 20 mg daily for eight weeks, then four weeks of follow-up. The primary endpoint was fatigue impact.

Source reviewed 2026-11-12.

Open source ↗

DOI: 10.3390/nu13082658

Citation and original source

Original source: Castro-Marrero J et al.. CoQ10 plus NADH: larger double-blind ME/CFS study Nutrients 2021.

Molekul research summary: https://molekul.io/research/coq10-nadh-mecfs-2021. Cite the original publication for its findings and this page when referring to Molekul’s summary or evidence appraisal.

Bibliography entry

Related compound profiles

Editorial policy and evidence standards